Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Clin Case Rep ; 8(12): 2436-2442, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1898591

ABSTRACT

Different cardiovascular presentations of coronavirus disease 2019 can be seen because of the systemic involvement. Considering its new presentations, there is need for further studies regarding the mechanistic pathways involved.

2.
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res ; 12(2): 156-157, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-624056

ABSTRACT

The disaster due to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) around the world has made investigators enthusiastic about working on different aspects of COVID-19. However, although the pandemic of COVID-19 has not yet ended, it seems that COVID-19 compared to the other coronavirus infections (the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome [MERS] and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome [SARS]) is more likely to target the heart. Comparing the previous presentations of the coronavirus family and the recent cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 can also help in predicting possible future challenges and taking measures to tackle these issues.

3.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 20(1): 53-55, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-422943

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the appropriate reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study consecutively enrolled patients who presented with STEMI and scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) during the outbreak of COVID-19. Due to the delay in the reporting of the polymerase chain reaction test results, our postprocedural triage regarding COVID-19, followed by the isolation strategy, was based on lung computerized tomography scan results. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with STEMI referred to our center. PPCI was done for 44 (91%) of these patients. The mean symptom-to-device time was 490.93 ± 454.608 minutes, and the mean first medical contact-to-device time was and 154.12 ± 36.27 minutes. Nine (18%) patients with STEMI were diagnosed as having typical/indeterminate features indicating COVID-19 involvement. During hospitalization, 1 (2.0%) patient died of cardiogenic shock. The study population was followed for 35.9 ± 12.7 days. Two patients expired in another centers due to COVID-19. No cardiac catheterization laboratory staff members were infected by COVID-19 during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our small report indicates that by taking the recommended safety measures and using appropriate PPE, we can continue PPCI as the main reperfusion strategy safely and effectively.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiac Care Facilities , Infection Control/organization & administration , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Tertiary Care Centers , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Retrospective Studies , Triage/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL